XXX vs. QQWZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XXX is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the 75% S&P 500 - 25% S&P XRP Reference Price Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. XXX is passively managed, while QQWZ is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

XXX vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XXX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: 8.23%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXX vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF	-4.54%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XXX and QQWZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.59

Return for Risk

XXX vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXX vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.01	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.51	—

Drawdowns

XXX vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXX	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.06%	-7.81%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	-5.35%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-1.56%	-4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XXX	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.30%	16.36%	+6.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.30%	16.19%	+7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	16.19%	+7.11%

XXX vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXX vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than QQWZ's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.57%	0.11%
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXX and QQWZ in my portfolio?

XXX and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XXX or QQWZ?

On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXX or QQWZ?

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXX or QQWZ?

QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.09% for XXX.

What is the main difference between XXX and QQWZ?

XXX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.49% for QQWZ.