PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXX vs. GMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXX vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XXX

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMMA

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.45%
YTD
3.61%
6M
3.75%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXX vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XXX and GMMA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXX vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXX

GMMA
GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXX vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XXX vs. GMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXXGMMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

1.09

-1.37

Drawdowns

XXX vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and GMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXGMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-5.21%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-0.41%

-4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-1.23%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

Volatility

XXX vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXXGMMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.35%

5.32%

+18.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

7.10%

+16.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

7.10%

+16.25%

XXX vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXX vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison

XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GMMA's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GMMA
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
3.65%3.00%0.57%
XXX
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF
0.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XXX and GMMA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.

GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.06% for XXX.

XXX tracks 75% S&P 500 - 25% S&P XRP Reference Price Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GMMA tracks MarketVector GammaRoad U.S. Equity Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.75% for GMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXX and GMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer