XXX vs. DWAT
XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XXX is passively managed, while DWAT is actively managed. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
XXX vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XXX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 2.42% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXX vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXX | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XXX vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXX | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | 0.00% | -12.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | 0.00% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | 0.00% | -5.27% |
Volatility
XXX vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXX | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 0.00% | +23.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 0.00% | +23.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 0.00% | +23.35% |
XXX vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXX vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XXX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XXX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
XXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for XXX and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer