PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. KROP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while KROP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.L's 18.70% return.


XXTW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.19%
6M
16.59%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
19.15%
ALL TIME*
17.56%

KROP.L

1D
0.98%
1M
1.45%
6M
12.38%
YTD
18.70%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
-1.21%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£1.89K£1.47K£2.69K
£635.62K£533.86K£515.60K

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
15.37%13.82%36.21%21.01%-21.35%
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
18.70%-0.05%-6.73%-26.39%-15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and KROP.L is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.19

The correlation between XXTW.L and KROP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XXTW.LKROP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.23

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

2.30

-1.02

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the KROP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and KROP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and KROP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LKROP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-50.76%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-8.40%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.41%

-25.48%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.39%

-37.04%

+21.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-34.59%

+27.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.82%

4.50%

+16.32%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) at 4.47%. This indicates that XXTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LKROP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

4.47%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.88%

13.09%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.64%

16.68%

+30.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.74%

20.17%

+11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

20.17%

+7.24%

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXTW.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXTW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXTW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and KROP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer