PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXSC.L is traded in GBp, while XNNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XXSC.L

1D
0.56%
1M
2.62%
YTD
6.58%
6M
9.35%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
8.44%

XNNS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
6.58%22.28%0.76%10.44%0.65%
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-7.92%6.27%24.09%26.71%-12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XXSC.L and XNNS.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.60

The correlation between XXSC.L and XNNS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XNNS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXSC.LXNNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXSC.LXNNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

Drawdowns

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXSC.LXNNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXSC.LXNNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XNNS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXSC.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXSC.L nor XNNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XXSC.L and XNNS.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNNS.L.

XXSC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNNS.L is Technology Equities. XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while XNNS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XXSC.L and 0.35% for XNNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXSC.L and XNNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer