PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXSC.L is traded in GBp, while XFSN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XFSN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXSC.L achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -3.95% return.


XXSC.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.23%
6M
2.55%
YTD
4.57%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
7.99%
ALL TIME*
4.76%

XFSN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
6M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XXSC.L and XFSN.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XFSN.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XXSC.LXFSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXSC.L drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, which is greater than XFSN.L's maximum drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXSC.L and XFSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXSC.LXFSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.17%

-41.92%

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-33.21%

+30.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-27.38%

+6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXSC.LXFSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

47.72%

-34.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

47.72%

-27.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

47.72%

-29.53%

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXSC.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXSC.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXSC.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XFSN.L.

XXSC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XFSN.L is Technology Equities. XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while XFSN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XXSC.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXSC.L and XFSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer