PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXSC.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XXSC.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 8.44%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


XXSC.L

1D
0.56%
1M
2.62%
YTD
6.58%
6M
9.35%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
8.44%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
6.58%22.28%0.76%10.44%-17.50%15.39%10.55%24.87%-14.91%23.58%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XXSC.L and LCPE.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.35

Over the past year, XXSC.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XXSC.L
LCPE.L

Industrials

26.6%
0.2%

Financial Services

15.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

8.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

7.5%
32.3%

Technology

7.4%
0.2%

Healthcare

7.3%
32.6%

Energy

5.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
32.8%

Utilities

2.5%

-

Industrials

XXSC.L
26.6%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Financial Services

XXSC.L
15.3%
LCPE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XXSC.L
11.4%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Real Estate

XXSC.L
8.3%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

XXSC.L
7.5%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Technology

XXSC.L
7.4%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Healthcare

XXSC.L
7.3%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Energy

XXSC.L
5.1%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Communication Services

XXSC.L
5.0%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XXSC.L
3.5%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Utilities

XXSC.L
2.5%
LCPE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXSC.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

4.13

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

13.66

-8.48

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXSC.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXSC.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.44

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.04

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.20

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.98

-0.22

Drawdowns

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXSC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXSC.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXSC.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-27.05%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-6.66%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-12.39%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-12.39%

-18.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-27.05%

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-2.71%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-3.52%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.02%

+1.00%

Volatility

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXSC.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.81%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

8.48%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

11.29%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.74%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

20.60%

-4.33%

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXSC.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXSC.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XXSC.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XXSC.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXSC.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer