XXRP vs. GLCR
XXRP (Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF) and GLCR (GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Teucrium, while GLCR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Iceland Global Total Return Net Index. XXRP is actively managed, while GLCR is passively managed. Over the past year, XXRP returned -90.09% vs -7.32% for GLCR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XXRP charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLCR.
Performance
XXRP vs. GLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXRP achieves a -69.63% return, which is significantly lower than GLCR's -10.49% return.
XXRP
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -28.47%
- YTD
- -69.63%
- 6M
- -79.63%
- 1Y
- -90.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -10.49%
- 6M
- -3.88%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXRP vs. GLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | -69.63% | -56.74% |
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | -10.49% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXRP and GLCR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXRP vs. GLCR — Risk / Return Rank
XXRP
GLCR
XXRP vs. GLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXRP | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.94 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.44 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -1.22 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXRP | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | -0.45 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.15 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
XXRP vs. GLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXRP drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than GLCR's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXRP and GLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXRP | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.20% | -16.79% | -78.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.20% | -16.79% | -78.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.20% | -16.79% | -78.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -4.54% | -55.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.22% | 6.02% | +65.20% |
Volatility
XXRP vs. GLCR - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a higher volatility of 27.69% compared to GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) at 7.93%. This indicates that XXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXRP | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.69% | 7.93% | +19.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.84% | 13.27% | +92.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.92% | 16.40% | +133.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.13% | 18.62% | +127.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.13% | 18.62% | +127.51% |
XXRP vs. GLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXRP has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GLCR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXRP vs. GLCR - Dividend Comparison
XXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.50%, more than GLCR's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | 1.08% | 0.97% |
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | 21.50% | 6.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXRP and GLCR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XXRP has higher volatility (27.69%) compared to GLCR (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXRP dropped -95.20% vs GLCR's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, GLCR leads with -7.32% vs -90.09% for XXRP. On fees, GLCR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLCR has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLCR has performed better with a -7.32% return vs -90.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLCR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.
XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 21.50%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.
XXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while GLCR is Europe Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XXRP and 0.95% for GLCR.
GLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XXRP and GLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer