PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XWTS.L having a 3.66% return and WTEL.L slightly higher at 3.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XWTS.L having a 10.80% annualized return and WTEL.L not far behind at 10.79%.


XWTS.L

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.22%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
10.80%

WTEL.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.74%
6M
3.36%
1Y
25.46%
3Y*
26.97%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
3.66%28.97%34.65%47.43%-37.76%16.03%22.50%26.25%-10.06%6.43%
WTEL.L
SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF
3.74%28.84%35.03%47.06%-37.79%15.91%22.40%26.15%-9.97%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XWTS.L and WTEL.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.98

The correlation between XWTS.L and WTEL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XWTS.L
WTEL.L

Communication Services

96.6%
99.1%

Technology

1.9%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XWTS.L
96.6%
WTEL.L
99.1%

Technology

XWTS.L
1.9%
WTEL.L
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XWTS.L
0.1%
WTEL.L
0.2%

Real Estate

XWTS.L
0.1%
WTEL.L
0.3%

Basic Materials

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L
0.0%

Energy

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L
0.0%

Financial Services

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L
0.0%

Healthcare

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L
0.0%

Industrials

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L
0.0%

Utilities

XWTS.L

-

WTEL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWTS.L
XWTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

WTEL.L
WTEL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WTEL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWTS.LWTEL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.13

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

8.43

+0.23

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the WTEL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWTS.L and WTEL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWTS.LWTEL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.71

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.61

-0.01

Drawdowns

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWTS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, roughly equal to the maximum WTEL.L drawdown of -44.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.L and WTEL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWTS.LWTEL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.71%

-44.74%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-11.88%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-19.15%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.71%

-44.74%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-44.74%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-3.04%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-8.95%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.01%

-0.16%

Volatility

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) is 4.13%, while SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that XWTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTEL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWTS.LWTEL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

10.76%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

14.85%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

19.14%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

17.88%

+0.09%

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWTS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WTEL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWTS.L vs. WTEL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWTS.L nor WTEL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XWTS.L and WTEL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XWTS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWTS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTEL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWTS.L and 0.30% for WTEL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWTS.L and WTEL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer