PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWTS.L vs. NHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWTS.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than NHI's -9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XWTS.L has outperformed NHI with an annualized return of 10.80%, while NHI has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.


XWTS.L

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.22%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
10.80%

NHI

1D
-1.75%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-9.53%
6M
-11.54%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
5.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
3.66%28.97%34.65%47.43%-37.76%16.03%22.50%26.25%-10.06%6.43%
NHI
National Health Investors, Inc.
-9.53%15.69%30.71%14.57%-3.26%-11.74%-8.67%13.67%5.93%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XWTS.L and NHI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.14

The correlation between XWTS.L and NHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWTS.L vs. NHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWTS.L
XWTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NHI
NHI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
NHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWTS.LNHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.03

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.04

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

0.13

+8.53

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the NHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWTS.L and NHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWTS.LNHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

0.04

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.28

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.18

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.39

+0.22

Drawdowns

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWTS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, smaller than the maximum NHI drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.L and NHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWTS.LNHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.71%

-82.88%

+38.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-24.09%

+12.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-24.09%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.71%

-25.68%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-63.04%

+18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-24.09%

+20.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-15.01%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

6.98%

-4.13%

Volatility

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) is 4.13%, while National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that XWTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWTS.LNHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.54%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

17.79%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

21.48%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

23.59%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

30.96%

-12.99%

Dividends

XWTS.L vs. NHI - Dividend Comparison

XWTS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHI
National Health Investors, Inc.
5.36%4.77%5.19%6.45%6.89%6.62%6.38%5.15%5.30%5.04%4.85%5.59%
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XWTS.L and NHI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWTS.L and NHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer