PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWTS.DE achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than WELR.DE's 3.18% return.


XWTS.DE

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
4.97%
6M
3.43%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
10.59%

WELR.DE

1D
0.97%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.18%
6M
1.21%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XWTS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
4.97%14.73%42.15%42.40%-9.11%
WELR.DE
Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.18%15.85%35.02%46.75%-6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XWTS.DE and WELR.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.95

The correlation between XWTS.DE and WELR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWTS.DE
XWTS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XWTS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

WELR.DE
WELR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WELR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWTS.DEWELR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.44

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

4.45

+4.68

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWTS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the WELR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWTS.DE and WELR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWTS.DEWELR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.35

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.32

-0.68

Drawdowns

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWTS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than WELR.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.DE and WELR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWTS.DEWELR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-25.22%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-14.70%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-25.22%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-2.48%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-4.28%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

4.75%

-2.30%

Volatility

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) is 3.84%, while Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that XWTS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WELR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWTS.DEWELR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.20%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

10.86%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

15.63%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

18.26%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

18.26%

-0.53%

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWTS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WELR.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XWTS.DE vs. WELR.DE - Dividend Comparison

XWTS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XWTS.DE and WELR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WELR.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELR.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWTS.DE.

XWTS.DE tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while WELR.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Communication Services. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWTS.DE and 0.18% for WELR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWTS.DE and WELR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer