PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWTS.DE vs. ARKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XWTS.DE is traded in EUR, while ARKW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWTS.DE achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XWTS.DE has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 10.59%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.61% annualized return.


XWTS.DE

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
4.97%
6M
3.43%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
10.59%

ARKW

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.08%
YTD
0.26%
6M
-4.52%
1Y
17.34%
3Y*
35.75%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
22.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XWTS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
4.97%14.73%42.15%42.40%-34.20%25.29%11.41%30.74%-6.07%-7.23%
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
0.26%22.44%51.66%90.98%-65.48%-12.78%136.22%38.83%9.13%64.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XWTS.DE and ARKW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016

0.39

The correlation between XWTS.DE and ARKW shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWTS.DE
XWTS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XWTS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWTS.DEARKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.11

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

0.49

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

0.97

+8.16

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWTS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWTS.DE and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWTS.DEARKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.53

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.07

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.61

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Drawdowns

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWTS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -77.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.DE and ARKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWTS.DEARKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-77.83%

+41.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-35.41%

+26.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-36.91%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-75.30%

+38.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

-77.83%

+41.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-18.36%

+15.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-22.47%

+13.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

17.88%

-15.43%

Volatility

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) is 3.84%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that XWTS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWTS.DEARKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

7.17%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

22.73%

-13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

32.67%

-18.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

42.45%

-24.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

37.31%

-19.58%

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWTS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWTS.DE vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

XWTS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.61%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
XWTS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XWTS.DE and ARKW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWTS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWTS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

XWTS.DE is categorized as Communications Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWTS.DE and 0.76% for ARKW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWTS.DE and ARKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer