XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE
XWTS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C) and IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - XWTS.DE is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares. XWTS.DE is passively managed, while IB1T.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, XWTS.DE returned 21.29% vs -40.00% for IB1T.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWTS.DE achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than IB1T.DE's -26.48% return.
XWTS.DE
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -20.86%
- YTD
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- 1Y
- -40.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XWTS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 4.97% | 18.54% |
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.48% | -15.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWTS.DE
IB1T.DE
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) and iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWTS.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.84 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.82 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | -1.44 | +10.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWTS.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | -1.02 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.81 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWTS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum IB1T.DE drawdown of -49.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWTS.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.66% | -49.39% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -49.39% | +40.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -48.64% | +45.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -20.44% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 28.18% | -25.73% |
Volatility
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) is 3.84%, while iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that XWTS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IB1T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWTS.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 9.86% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 31.08% | -21.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 39.64% | -25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 40.27% | -22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 40.27% | -22.54% |
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWTS.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWTS.DE nor IB1T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XWTS.DE is categorized as Communications Equities, while IB1T.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XWTS.DE and IB1T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer