XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE
XWIS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XWIS.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XWIS.L returned 5.80%/yr vs 16.14%/yr for XNAS.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWIS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWIS.L is traded in GBP, while XNAS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XNAS.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWIS.L achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 16.87% return.
XWIS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- —
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP | 12.92% | 16.99% | 14.88% | -3.06% | -13.20% | 16.51% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 16.87% | 12.68% | 27.92% | 48.34% | -26.16% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWIS.L and XNAS.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XWIS.L and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWIS.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XNAS.DE
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XWIS.L | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 2.66 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 7.41 | -6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWIS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.29%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWIS.L and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWIS.L | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.29% | -27.63% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.55% | -11.01% | -16.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -25.14% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.92% | -27.63% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.26% | -3.74% | -11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -6.98% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.17% | 3.95% | +13.22% |
Volatility
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) is 4.78%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that XWIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWIS.L | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 5.93% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 12.52% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.44% | 16.97% | +27.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 19.72% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 19.61% | +2.19% |
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWIS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWIS.L vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWIS.L nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWIS.L and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWIS.L.
XWIS.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XWIS.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWIS.L and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XWIS.L and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer