XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE
XWEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - XWEV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Value Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEV.L returned 40.36% vs 26.30% for ENTR.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XWEV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWEV.L is traded in USD, while ENTR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENTR.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWEV.L achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 5.21% return.
XWEV.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XWEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 17.47% | 36.21% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.21% | 25.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWEV.L and ENTR.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWEV.L
ENTR.DE
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEV.L) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XWEV.L | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.31 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.68 | 6.57 | +8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWEV.L drawdown since its inception was -14.23%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEV.L and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWEV.L | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -12.13% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -11.42% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -8.86% | +7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -2.92% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 4.02% | -1.28% |
Volatility
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) at 4.20%. This indicates that XWEV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWEV.L | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.20% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 13.23% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 17.82% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 17.02% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 17.02% | -1.93% |
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWEV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XWEV.L vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWEV.L nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWEV.L and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XWEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
XWEV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. XWEV.L tracks MSCI World Value Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEV.L and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for XWEV.L and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer