XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE
XWEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and XWEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds from Xtrackers - XWEQ.DE tracks the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select while XWEB.DE tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Low Carbon SRI Screened Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEQ.DE returned 23.57% vs 3.62% for XWEB.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWEQ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than XWEB.DE's 1.64% return.
XWEQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWEB.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 9.71% | 4.46% | 25.97% | 10.47% |
XWEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 1.64% | 1.61% | 16.94% | 4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWEQ.DE
XWEB.DE
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWEQ.DE | XWEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 0.63 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 1.53 | +11.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWEQ.DE | XWEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 0.41 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, which is greater than XWEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWEQ.DE | XWEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -14.46% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -5.03% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -3.10% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -3.02% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.10% | -0.24% |
Volatility
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEB.DE) at 2.21%. This indicates that XWEQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWEQ.DE | XWEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.21% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 5.37% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 7.78% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 9.49% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 9.49% | +5.69% |
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWEQ.DE vs. XWEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWEQ.DE nor XWEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XWEQ.DE tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while XWEB.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility Low Carbon SRI Screened Select.
Find the right allocation for XWEQ.DE and XWEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer