XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XWEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XWEQ.DE tracks the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEQ.DE returned 23.57% vs 26.89% for WRLD.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWEQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.

Performance

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEQ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.

XWEQ.DE

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 11.10%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WRLD.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 18.45%
• 6M: 18.65%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 10.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XWEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C	9.71%	4.46%	25.97%	0.47%
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	18.45%	11.71%	1.59%	-2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2023	0.66

The correlation between XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEQ.DE

XWEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
XWEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XWEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XWEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
XWEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XWEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

WRLD.DE

WRLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WRLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WRLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XWEQ.DE	WRLD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.91	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.66	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.57	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.77	11.33	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XWEQ.DE	WRLD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.91	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.38	+0.52

Drawdowns

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, roughly equal to the maximum WRLD.DE drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWEQ.DE	WRLD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.80%	-23.55%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-7.90%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.38%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-9.51%	+4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.50%	-0.64%

Volatility

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) is 2.76%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that XWEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWEQ.DE	WRLD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	4.50%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.36%	11.34%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	14.81%	-3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.98%	-1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.98%	-1.80%

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

XWEQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEQ.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE in my portfolio?

XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWEQ.DE or WRLD.DE?

On fees, XWEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWEQ.DE or WRLD.DE?

XWEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.

What is the main difference between XWEQ.DE and WRLD.DE?

XWEQ.DE tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEQ.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.