XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE
XWEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and EXUS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both Global Equities funds from Xtrackers - XWEQ.DE tracks the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select while EXUS.DE tracks the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEQ.DE returned 23.57% vs 20.06% for EXUS.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWEQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.DE.
Performance
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XWEQ.DE having a 9.71% return and EXUS.DE slightly lower at 9.64%.
XWEQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EXUS.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XWEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 9.71% | 4.46% | 13.19% |
EXUS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 9.64% | 17.80% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and EXUS.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and EXUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWEQ.DE
EXUS.DE
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWEQ.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.30 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 9.01 | +3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWEQ.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.62 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.10 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, which is greater than EXUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and EXUS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWEQ.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -16.21% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -8.68% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.76% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -1.78% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.23% | -0.37% |
Volatility
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) is 2.76%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XWEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWEQ.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 3.28% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 10.06% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 12.37% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 13.39% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 13.39% | +1.79% |
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWEQ.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWEQ.DE nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWEQ.DE and EXUS.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWEQ.DE.
XWEQ.DE tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEQ.DE and 0.15% for EXUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XWEQ.DE and EXUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer