XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE
XWEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and AVWS.DE (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - XWEQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while AVWS.DE is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. XWEQ.DE is passively managed, while AVWS.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, XWEQ.DE returned 23.57% vs 35.43% for AVWS.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWEQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for AVWS.DE.
Performance
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWEQ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than AVWS.DE's 18.30% return.
XWEQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVWS.DE
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 35.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XWEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 9.71% | 4.46% | 5.15% |
AVWS.DE Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR | 18.30% | 7.87% | 5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and AVWS.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XWEQ.DE and AVWS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XWEQ.DE
AVWS.DE
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWEQ.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 5.44 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 20.29 | -7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWEQ.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.40 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.08 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, smaller than the maximum AVWS.DE drawdown of -25.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and AVWS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWEQ.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -25.21% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -6.39% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.39% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -5.13% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) is 2.76%, while Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that XWEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVWS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWEQ.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 3.27% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 9.60% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 14.48% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 18.12% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 18.12% | -2.94% |
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVWS.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XWEQ.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWEQ.DE nor AVWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWEQ.DE and AVWS.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XWEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
XWEQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AVWS.DE is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEQ.DE and 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XWEQ.DE and AVWS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer