PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XWEM.L is traded in USD, while IQSS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IQSS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEM.L achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than IQSS.L's 13.38% return.


XWEM.L

1D
-2.50%
1M
4.24%
YTD
21.64%
6M
20.97%
1Y
35.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IQSS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.59%
YTD
13.38%
6M
13.17%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XWEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C
21.64%21.57%4.81%
IQSS.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
13.38%22.92%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEM.L and IQSS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024

0.85

The correlation between XWEM.L and IQSS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEM.L
XWEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XWEM.LIQSS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.40

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

14.88

-1.10

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEM.L and IQSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEM.L drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, which is greater than IQSS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEM.L and IQSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWEM.LIQSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-17.15%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-8.89%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-1.70%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-1.97%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.03%

+0.72%

Volatility

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) at 3.66%. This indicates that XWEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWEM.LIQSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

3.66%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

9.98%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

12.79%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

15.17%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

15.17%

+2.24%

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQSS.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWEM.L vs. IQSS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEM.L nor IQSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XWEM.L and IQSS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IQSS.L.

XWEM.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IQSS.L is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEM.L and 0.60% for IQSS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWEM.L and IQSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer