XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XWEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XWEB.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while AXQT.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEB.DE returned 3.62% vs 68.47% for AXQT.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XWEB.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AXQT.DE.

Performance

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEB.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEB.DE achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than AXQT.DE's 40.98% return.

XWEB.DE

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 3.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AXQT.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 40.98%
• 6M: 43.57%
• 1Y: 68.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XWEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C	1.64%	-2.76%
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc	40.98%	15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.34

The correlation between XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEB.DE

XWEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 15
XWEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XWEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XWEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XWEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XWEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

AXQT.DE

AXQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AXQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEB.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XWEB.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	3.62	-3.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	4.47	-3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.64	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	6.01	-5.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	22.04	-20.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XWEB.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	3.62	-3.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	2.20	-1.32

Drawdowns

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum AXQT.DE drawdown of -18.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWEB.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	-18.65%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-11.49%	+6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-2.23%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-3.07%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	3.14%	-1.04%

Volatility

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEB.DE) is 2.21%, while AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that XWEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWEB.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	8.70%	-6.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.37%	16.43%	-11.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.78%	19.11%	-11.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.49%	20.01%	-10.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.49%	20.01%	-10.52%

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AXQT.DE's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XWEB.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEB.DE nor AXQT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE in my portfolio?

XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWEB.DE or AXQT.DE?

On fees, XWEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWEB.DE or AXQT.DE?

XWEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AXQT.DE.

What is the main difference between XWEB.DE and AXQT.DE?

XWEB.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AXQT.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XWEB.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while AXQT.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEB.DE and 0.27% for AXQT.DE.