XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L
XWD1.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - XWD1.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. XWD1.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XWD1.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 31.26%
- 6M
- 34.99%
- 1Y
- 62.28%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWD1.L
IWVL.L
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWD1.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.61 | — |
Drawdowns
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWD1.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.14% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.48% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWD1.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.76% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.06% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.02% | — |
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWD1.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWD1.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWD1.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XWD1.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWD1.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.
XWD1.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for XWD1.L and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer