PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XWD.TO (iShares MSCI World Index ETF) and BREA.TO (Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XWD.TO is passively managed, while BREA.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XWD.TO returned 14.88%/yr vs 14.53%/yr for BREA.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XWD.TO charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BREA.TO.

Performance

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) and Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWD.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than BREA.TO's 14.61% return.

XWD.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
6.27%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.63%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
13.55%

BREA.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
0.38%
YTD
14.61%
6M
14.48%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XWD.TO
iShares MSCI World Index ETF		11.99%15.25%28.07%20.32%-11.57%21.87%20.59%
BREA.TO
Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF		14.61%21.56%23.40%6.31%-2.35%18.66%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XWD.TO and BREA.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020

0.36

Over the past year, XWD.TO and BREA.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XWD.TO
BREA.TO

Technology

29.0%
4.8%

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Industrials

11.0%
45.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

9.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Energy

4.1%
19.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
5.4%

Utilities

2.7%
10.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.1%

Technology

XWD.TO
29.0%
BREA.TO
4.8%

Financial Services

XWD.TO
15.9%
BREA.TO

-

Industrials

XWD.TO
11.0%
BREA.TO
45.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XWD.TO
9.3%
BREA.TO

-

Communication Services

XWD.TO
9.1%
BREA.TO
9.9%

Healthcare

XWD.TO
8.6%
BREA.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XWD.TO
5.3%
BREA.TO

-

Energy

XWD.TO
4.1%
BREA.TO
19.9%

Basic Materials

XWD.TO
3.2%
BREA.TO
5.4%

Utilities

XWD.TO
2.7%
BREA.TO
10.1%

Real Estate

XWD.TO
1.9%
BREA.TO
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Index ETF

Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF

Often compared with XWD.TO:
XWD.TO vs. XEQT.TOXWD.TO vs. URTHXWD.TO vs. VTXWD.TO vs. VWRA.LXWD.TO vs. ZGQ.TOXWD.TO vs. SPYXWD.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Often compared with BREA.TO:
BREA.TO vs. FGEP.TOBREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEOBREA.TO vs. CAGE.TOBREA.TO vs. KNGG.TOBREA.TO vs. XEQT.TOBREA.TO vs. VXC.TOBREA.TO vs. XMW.TO

Return for Risk

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XWD.TO
XWD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XWD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
BREA.TO
BREA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) and Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XWD.TOBREA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
1.92

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.37
2.67

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.25

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

11.21

+3.77

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWD.TO and BREA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XWD.TOBREA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.92

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.89

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.96

-0.05

Drawdowns

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWD.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than BREA.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWD.TO and BREA.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XWD.TOBREA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-19.15%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-8.35%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-16.36%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

-19.15%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.33%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-4.40%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.42%

-0.54%

Volatility

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) is 3.55%, while Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that XWD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BREA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XWD.TOBREA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.70%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

11.30%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

14.19%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.71%

16.34%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.68%

-0.32%

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWD.TO has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BREA.TO's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

XWD.TO vs. BREA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XWD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than BREA.TO's 4.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BREA.TO
Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF		4.85%4.95%4.89%5.17%4.81%4.12%3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XWD.TO
iShares MSCI World Index ETF		1.19%1.33%1.19%1.39%1.36%1.21%1.06%1.77%1.94%1.63%1.83%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

XWD.TO and BREA.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWD.TO is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWD.TO is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BREA.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for XWD.TO and 0.96% for BREA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWD.TO and BREA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer