PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO).

BREA.TO and FCIN.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BREA.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton Funds. It was launched on Apr 30, 2020. FCIN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024.

Performance

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
BREA.TO
Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF		6.01%21.56%24.11%
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF		6.13%26.32%9.80%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BREA.TO having a 6.01% return and FCIN.NEO slightly higher at 6.13%.

BREA.TO

1D
-0.92%
1M
-7.28%
YTD
6.01%
6M
4.71%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
—

FCIN.NEO

1D
2.72%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
6.13%
6M
9.44%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF

Fidelity All-International Equity ETF

Often compared with BREA.TO:
BREA.TO vs. FGEP.TOBREA.TO vs. CAGE.TOBREA.TO vs. XMW.TOBREA.TO vs. VXC.TOBREA.TO vs. VEQT.TOBREA.TO vs. XEQT.TOBREA.TO vs. CYH.TO
Often compared with FCIN.NEO:
FCIN.NEO vs. MEQT.TOFCIN.NEO vs. FCID.TOFCIN.NEO vs. XMY.TOFCIN.NEO vs. BGIE.TOFCIN.NEO vs. CYH.TOFCIN.NEO vs. FBTC.TOFCIN.NEO vs. XEF.TO

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BREA.TO
Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BREA.TO
BREA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BREA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO
FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BREA.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

1.36

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

1.92

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.01

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.32

8.50

+0.83

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BREA.TO and FCIN.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BREA.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.36

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.43

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BREA.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BREA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, while FCIN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020
BREA.TO
Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF		4.53%4.95%4.89%5.17%4.81%4.12%3.08%
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BREA.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BREA.TO and FCIN.NEO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

BREA.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-12.34%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.07%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-5.52%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-1.54%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.64%

+0.15%

Volatility

BREA.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) is 5.68%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that BREA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

BREA.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

6.82%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

10.27%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

15.59%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

13.85%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

13.85%

+1.84%