PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVV vs. CPSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XVV vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVV achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.29% return.


XVV

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.81%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.29%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*

CPSU

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.84%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XVV vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XVV and CPSU is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.81

The correlation between XVV and CPSU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XVV vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVV
XVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSU
CPSU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVV vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVVCPSUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.97

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

6.29

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

42.62

-31.44

XVV vs. CPSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the CPSU Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVV and CPSU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVVCPSUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.76

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

3.81

-2.81

Drawdowns

XVV vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVV drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVV and CPSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XVVCPSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-1.03%

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-1.03%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.15%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-0.07%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

0.15%

+2.24%

Volatility

XVV vs. CPSU - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) at 0.29%. This indicates that XVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XVVCPSUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

0.29%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

1.39%

+8.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

1.72%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

1.72%

+15.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

1.72%

+15.63%

XVV vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSU's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XVV vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison

XVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CPSU
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
0.88%0.94%1.05%1.25%1.57%0.81%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XVV and CPSU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XVV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to CPSU (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XVV dropped -27.20% vs CPSU's -1.03%.

On 1-year performance, XVV leads with 26.65% vs 6.43% for CPSU. On fees, XVV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CPSU has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XVV has performed better with a 26.65% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XVV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSU.

XVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.

XVV is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSU is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XVV and 0.69% for CPSU.

CPSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XVV and CPSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer