PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVOL vs. RPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XVOL vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XVOL vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
-2.57%9.52%20.00%7.42%-20.78%13.22%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
3.85%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%9.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVOL achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly lower than RPAR's 3.85% return.


XVOL

1D
2.15%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
-2.57%
6M
-2.90%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
10Y*

RPAR

1D
1.55%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
3.85%
6M
6.09%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XVOL vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVOL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XVOL vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVOL
XVOL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVOL vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVOLRPARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.34

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.86

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.05

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

7.30

-1.36

XVOL vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVOL and RPAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVOLRPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.34

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.32

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between XVOL and RPAR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XVOL vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

XVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than RPAR's 2.15% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
2.01%1.95%3.13%1.09%2.86%0.30%0.00%0.00%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.15%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%

Drawdowns

XVOL vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVOL drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVOL and RPAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XVOLRPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-30.16%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.10%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-5.97%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-11.83%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.27%

+0.17%

Volatility

XVOL vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XVOLRPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.81%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

7.74%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

11.75%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

12.36%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

12.74%

+4.76%