PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVOL vs. LBAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XVOL vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XVOL vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
-2.57%9.52%20.00%7.42%-20.78%13.22%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
15.90%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%8.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVOL achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly lower than LBAY's 15.90% return.


XVOL

1D
2.15%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
-2.57%
6M
-2.90%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
10Y*

LBAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
15.90%
6M
14.05%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XVOL vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVOL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XVOL vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVOL
XVOL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVOL vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVOLLBAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.20

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

3.16

+2.79

XVOL vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the LBAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVOL and LBAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVOLLBAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.73

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between XVOL and LBAY is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XVOL vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

XVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than LBAY's 3.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
2.01%1.95%3.13%1.09%2.86%0.30%0.00%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.40%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%

Drawdowns

XVOL vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVOL drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVOL and LBAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XVOLLBAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-15.99%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-9.71%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-2.73%

-4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-6.77%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

4.18%

-1.74%

Volatility

XVOL vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) is 4.80%, while Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that XVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XVOLLBAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.55%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

12.16%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

16.19%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

13.49%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

13.66%

+3.84%