PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XV vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XV vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF (XV) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XV achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.74% return.


XV

1D
0.98%
1M
0.94%
YTD
3.32%
6M
2.71%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.65%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XV vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XV and CAOS is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XV vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XV
XV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XV vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF (XV) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XVCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.37

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

5.80

+2.59

XV vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XV Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XV and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XV vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XV drawdown since its inception was -5.73%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XV and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XVCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-3.89%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

-0.76%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.15%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-0.91%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.31%

+1.21%

Volatility

XV vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF (XV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.32%. This indicates that XV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XVCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

0.32%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

1.04%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

1.53%

+7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

4.25%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.90%

4.25%

+6.65%

XV vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

XV vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

XV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.20%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%
XV
Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF
19.20%13.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


XV and CAOS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to CAOS (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XV dropped -5.73% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

On 1-year performance, XV leads with 13.14% vs 1.60% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XV has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 1.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XV.

XV has the higher dividend yield at 19.20%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

XV is categorized as Derivative Income, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XV and 0.63% for CAOS.

XV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XV and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer