PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. XUU.TO is passively managed, while RUD.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUU.TO returned 15.76%/yr vs 17.31%/yr for RUD.TO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUU.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for RUD.TO.

Performance

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUU.TO achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than RUD.TO's 10.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XUU.TO has underperformed RUD.TO with an annualized return of 15.76%, while RUD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.

XUU.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.13%
YTD
12.63%
6M
11.87%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
23.33%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
15.76%

RUD.TO

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.34%
YTD
10.65%
6M
6.89%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
16.39%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		12.63%11.25%34.07%23.11%-13.53%25.94%16.26%23.78%2.43%12.80%
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		10.65%7.35%25.76%23.90%-15.14%54.34%13.61%25.93%6.03%14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XUU.TO and RUD.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.78

The correlation between XUU.TO and RUD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUU.TO
RUD.TO

Technology

37.0%
31.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
12.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
13.2%

Industrials

9.0%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.4%

Energy

3.3%
5.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.8%

Utilities

2.2%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.5%

Technology

XUU.TO
37.0%
RUD.TO
31.1%

Financial Services

XUU.TO
11.4%
RUD.TO
12.9%

Communication Services

XUU.TO
10.0%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XUU.TO
10.0%
RUD.TO
13.2%

Industrials

XUU.TO
9.0%
RUD.TO
8.7%

Healthcare

XUU.TO
8.6%
RUD.TO
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

XUU.TO
4.4%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Energy

XUU.TO
3.3%
RUD.TO
5.0%

Real Estate

XUU.TO
2.3%
RUD.TO
0.8%

Utilities

XUU.TO
2.2%
RUD.TO
3.0%

Basic Materials

XUU.TO
1.9%
RUD.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)

Often compared with XUU.TO:
XUU.TO vs. XUS.TOXUU.TO vs. VUN.TOXUU.TO vs. XAW.TOXUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUU.TO vs. XIC.TOXUU.TO vs. VTIXUU.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with RUD.TO:
RUD.TO vs. VGG.TORUD.TO vs. ZUQ.TORUD.TO vs. ZGQ.TORUD.TO vs. CEW.TORUD.TO vs. FCUV.TORUD.TO vs. XGRO.TORUD.TO vs. QQC.TO

Return for Risk

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUU.TO
XUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
RUD.TO
RUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XUU.TORUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.25
1.91

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.06
2.61

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.58

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

12.74

-0.67

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUU.TO and RUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum RUD.TO drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU.TO and RUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUU.TORUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-35.99%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-6.65%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-28.31%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

-28.31%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.22%

-35.99%

+7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.87%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-10.08%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.86%

+0.47%

Volatility

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that XUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUU.TORUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.70%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.78%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

12.44%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

35.34%

-19.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

44.72%

-28.09%

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RUD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

XUU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than RUD.TO's 1.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		1.38%1.38%3.43%5.24%5.51%3.38%5.73%6.77%7.06%6.23%6.07%7.42%
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		1.01%1.16%1.02%1.22%1.38%1.01%1.33%1.68%1.74%1.49%1.65%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUU.TO and RUD.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RUD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XUU.TO and 0.43% for RUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUU.TO and RUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer