XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO
XUU-U.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and QQQQ.TO (Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUU-U.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while QQQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUU-U.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QQQQ.TO.
Performance
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XUU-U.TO is traded in USD, while QQQQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQQQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUU-U.TO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQQQ.TO's 19.74% return.
XUU-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 28.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 11.58% | 5.51% |
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 19.74% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUU-U.TO and QQQQ.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUU-U.TO
QQQQ.TO
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUU-U.TO | QQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUU-U.TO | QQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 2.68 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.73%, which is greater than QQQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU-U.TO and QQQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUU-U.TO | QQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.73% | -11.59% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.63% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -2.52% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUU-U.TO | QQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 17.45% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 17.45% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 17.45% | +0.20% |
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUU-U.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUU-U.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQQQ.TO's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.76% | 0.85% | 1.01% | 0.77% | 0.90% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUU-U.TO and QQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.
XUU-U.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index, while QQQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XUU-U.TO and 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for XUU-U.TO and QQQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer