XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
XUU-U.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XUU-U.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUU-U.TO returned 12.61%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for QQC-F.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUU-U.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC-F.TO.
Performance
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XUU-U.TO is traded in USD, while QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQC-F.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUU-U.TO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQC-F.TO's 17.66% return.
XUU-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 28.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 11.58% | 16.34% | 22.50% | 26.52% | -20.40% | 28.14% | 18.72% | 7.44% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 17.66% | 24.09% | 14.38% | 56.29% | -37.87% | 28.09% | 47.94% | 11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, XUU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUU-U.TO
QQC-F.TO
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUU-U.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.41 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | 9.54 | +5.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUU-U.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.00 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.51 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.68 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.73%, smaller than the maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUU-U.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.73% | -41.72% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -14.51% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -22.95% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -41.72% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.17% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -7.47% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.66% | -1.80% |
Volatility
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) is 2.87%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that XUU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUU-U.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 4.75% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 13.37% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 17.50% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 25.66% | -8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 25.72% | -8.07% |
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUU-U.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.76% | 0.85% | 1.01% | 0.77% | 0.90% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.
XUU-U.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQC-F.TO is Nasdaq-100. XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index, while QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XUU-U.TO and 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.
Find the right allocation for XUU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer