PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUT3.L vs. TRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUT3.L achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than TRES.L's -0.30% return.


XUT3.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.93%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.74%

TRES.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.54%5.06%4.13%4.10%-3.60%-0.62%2.95%3.01%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.30%6.57%0.75%3.82%-12.15%-2.44%8.00%5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XUT3.L and TRES.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.72

The correlation between XUT3.L and TRES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUT3.LTRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.16

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

1.23

+3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.02

3.84

+16.18

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the TRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUT3.L and TRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUT3.LTRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

0.89

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

-0.07

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.23

+0.91

Drawdowns

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUT3.L drawdown since its inception was -5.45%, smaller than the maximum TRES.L drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT3.L and TRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUT3.LTRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-18.77%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-2.93%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.91%

-5.16%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.45%

-16.40%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-6.77%

+6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-8.61%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

0.94%

-0.77%

Volatility

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) is 0.41%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that XUT3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUT3.LTRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

1.36%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.80%

2.75%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13%

4.08%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.90%

5.73%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.50%

5.67%

-4.17%

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUT3.L and TRES.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUT3.L vs. TRES.L - Dividend Comparison

XUT3.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than TRES.L's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.25%4.19%4.26%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.96%0.00%0.00%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUT3.L and TRES.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUT3.L and TRES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index, while TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUT3.L and TRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer