PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUT3.L is traded in USD, while IBTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUT3.L achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than IBTG.L's 0.77% return.


XUT3.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.02%
6M
0.74%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
1.73%

IBTG.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.42%
6M
1.58%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.68%5.06%4.13%4.10%-3.60%-0.62%2.95%3.56%1.62%
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.77%13.01%2.02%9.12%-14.76%-1.72%5.84%5.84%-9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XUT3.L and IBTG.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018

0.29

The correlation between XUT3.L and IBTG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTG.L
IBTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUT3.LIBTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.09

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

0.77

+3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.93

1.52

+16.40

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUT3.L and IBTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUT3.L drawdown since its inception was -5.45%, smaller than the maximum IBTG.L drawdown of -28.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT3.L and IBTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUT3.LIBTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-28.91%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-4.57%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.91%

-9.34%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.45%

-27.65%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-2.05%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-8.66%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

2.30%

-2.13%

Volatility

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) is 0.36%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that XUT3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUT3.LIBTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

1.78%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

5.14%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13%

6.97%

-5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.89%

9.33%

-7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.49%

9.23%

-7.74%

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUT3.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUT3.L vs. IBTG.L - Dividend Comparison

XUT3.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than IBTG.L's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.86%4.08%4.12%2.92%0.76%0.59%1.66%2.35%0.78%0.00%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.83%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUT3.L and IBTG.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUT3.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUT3.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBTG.L.

XUT3.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBTG.L is Short-Term Bond. XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index, while IBTG.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUT3.L and 0.10% for IBTG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUT3.L and IBTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer