PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTG.L vs. TREI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTG.L is traded in GBP, while TREI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TREI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTG.L achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 2.42% return.


IBTG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.08%
6M
0.68%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*

TREI.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.68%5.08%3.75%3.65%-4.56%-0.82%2.70%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
2.42%-3.12%7.01%-0.27%12.48%0.92%-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTG.L and TREI.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTG.L
IBTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTG.LTREI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.11

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

0.83

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

2.27

+12.14

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTG.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTG.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum TREI.L drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG.L and TREI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTG.LTREI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-19.00%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-5.11%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.85%

-9.81%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.13%

-15.98%

+9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.65%

+5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-10.06%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

1.87%

-1.65%

Volatility

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) is 0.45%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that IBTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTG.LTREI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

1.74%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

5.04%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

6.59%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

8.41%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

8.77%

-6.70%

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTG.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than TREI.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.87%4.08%4.12%2.92%0.76%0.59%1.66%2.35%0.78%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTG.L and TREI.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBTG.L.

IBTG.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBTG.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTG.L and TREI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer