PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUT.TO achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than PINC.TO's 13.46% return.


XUT.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
3.21%
YTD
14.90%
6M
13.55%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.43%

PINC.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.46%
YTD
13.46%
6M
14.63%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF
14.90%18.91%13.09%-0.45%-11.02%10.80%14.74%36.63%-0.73%
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
13.46%14.41%17.01%5.89%-8.44%26.14%2.90%14.28%-6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XUT.TO and PINC.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2018

0.41

The correlation between XUT.TO and PINC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUT.TO
PINC.TO

Utilities

90.7%
17.4%

Energy

9.3%
22.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

28.9%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Industrials

-

0.9%

Real Estate

-

21.3%

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

XUT.TO
90.7%
PINC.TO
17.4%

Energy

XUT.TO
9.3%
PINC.TO
22.1%

Basic Materials

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
0.8%

Communication Services

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
0.5%

Financial Services

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
28.9%

Healthcare

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
1.3%

Industrials

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
0.9%

Real Estate

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
21.3%

Technology

XUT.TO

-

PINC.TO
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUT.TO
XUT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XUT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PINC.TO
PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUT.TOPINC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.75

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

6.48

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

24.84

-12.39

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUT.TO and PINC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUT.TOPINC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

3.59

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.15

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.62

-0.09

Drawdowns

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, smaller than the maximum PINC.TO drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT.TO and PINC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUT.TOPINC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.65%

-43.84%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-3.59%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-9.38%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-15.59%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.14%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.41%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.93%

+1.01%

Volatility

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) at 1.92%. This indicates that XUT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUT.TOPINC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

1.92%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

5.06%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

6.48%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

8.58%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

14.91%

+1.18%

Dividends

XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than PINC.TO's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
4.54%5.05%10.05%10.60%9.99%8.17%7.34%5.06%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF
3.23%3.79%4.00%3.90%3.80%2.99%4.51%3.57%4.52%3.57%3.74%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUT.TO and PINC.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUT.TO and PINC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer