XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO
XUT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF) and PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XUT.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while PINC.TO is a fund fund. Over the past 5 years, XUT.TO returned 7.97%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for PINC.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUT.TO achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than PINC.TO's 13.46% return.
XUT.TO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
PINC.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 14.90% | 18.91% | 13.09% | -0.45% | -11.02% | 10.80% | 14.74% | 36.63% | -0.73% |
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund | 13.46% | 14.41% | 17.01% | 5.89% | -8.44% | 26.14% | 2.90% | 14.28% | -6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUT.TO and PINC.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2018 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XUT.TO and PINC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUT.TO
PINC.TO
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XUT.TO
PINC.TO
Energy
XUT.TO
PINC.TO
Basic Materials
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Communication Services
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Consumer Defensive
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Financial Services
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Healthcare
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Industrials
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Real Estate
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Technology
XUT.TO
-
PINC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUT.TO
PINC.TO
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUT.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.75 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 6.48 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 24.84 | -12.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUT.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 3.59 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.15 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, smaller than the maximum PINC.TO drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT.TO and PINC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUT.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.65% | -43.84% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -3.59% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -9.38% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -15.59% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.14% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -4.41% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.93% | +1.01% |
Volatility
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) at 1.92%. This indicates that XUT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUT.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.92% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 5.06% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 6.48% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 8.58% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 14.91% | +1.18% |
Dividends
XUT.TO vs. PINC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than PINC.TO's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund | 4.54% | 5.05% | 10.05% | 10.60% | 9.99% | 8.17% | 7.34% | 5.06% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 3.23% | 3.79% | 4.00% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 2.99% | 4.51% | 3.57% | 4.52% | 3.57% | 3.74% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUT.TO and PINC.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XUT.TO and PINC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer