PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSF.TO achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than XFN.TO's 12.51% return.


XUSF.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-6.02%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XFN.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.10%
YTD
12.51%
6M
17.66%
1Y
41.54%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
-6.02%9.67%39.77%8.23%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
12.51%34.40%29.32%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSF.TO and XFN.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023

0.46

The correlation between XUSF.TO and XFN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSF.TO
XUSF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XUSF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XFN.TO
XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSF.TOXFN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.61

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

5.35

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

21.60

-21.24

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSF.TO and XFN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSF.TOXFN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

3.46

-3.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.64

+0.35

Drawdowns

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum XFN.TO drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSF.TO and XFN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSF.TOXFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-56.55%

+39.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

-7.80%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-1.39%

-7.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-6.60%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

1.93%

+4.14%

Volatility

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) is 2.65%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that XUSF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSF.TOXFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.19%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

10.10%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

12.07%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

13.47%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

16.53%

+1.37%

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XFN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than XFN.TO's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
2.17%2.39%3.16%3.60%3.48%2.67%3.35%3.00%3.43%2.73%2.83%3.17%
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
0.91%0.75%0.81%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSF.TO and XFN.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUSF.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUSF.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.

XUSF.TO tracks S&P Financial Select Sector Index, while XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUSF.TO and 0.61% for XFN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSF.TO and XFN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer