PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
-8.65%9.67%35.67%
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
-9.81%7.70%32.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSF.TO achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly higher than FMAX.TO's -9.81% return.


XUSF.TO

1D
3.72%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
-8.65%
6M
-7.69%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMAX.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-9.81%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAX.TO's 1.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSF.TO
XUSF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XUSF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAX.TO
FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSF.TOFMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

-0.22

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

-0.16

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.27

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

-0.77

+0.51

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSF.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSF.TO and FMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSF.TOFMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

-0.22

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.78

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XUSF.TO and FMAX.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FMAX.TO's 11.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
XUSF.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF
0.93%0.75%0.81%0.34%
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
11.57%11.03%9.19%0.00%

Drawdowns

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum FMAX.TO drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSF.TO and FMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSF.TOFMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-17.84%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

-15.83%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.42%

-12.66%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-3.63%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

5.53%

+0.05%

Volatility

XUSF.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) at 4.78%. This indicates that XUSF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUSF.TOFMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

4.78%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

11.99%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

19.32%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.31%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.31%

+2.03%