XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO
XUSF.TO (iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF) and HFG.TO (Hamilton Global Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. XUSF.TO is passively managed, while HFG.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, XUSF.TO returned 10.42% vs 17.90% for HFG.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUSF.TO achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than HFG.TO's 7.82% return.
XUSF.TO
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 10.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFG.TO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSF.TO iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF | 4.97% | 9.67% | 39.77% | 8.23% |
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 7.82% | 22.93% | 30.80% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUSF.TO and HFG.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2023 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUSF.TO
HFG.TO
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUSF.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.64 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | 5.19 | -3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum HFG.TO drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSF.TO and HFG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUSF.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.88% | -42.71% | +25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -10.95% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.79% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -5.37% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 3.46% | +2.69% |
Volatility
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) at 3.65%. This indicates that XUSF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUSF.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 3.65% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 10.72% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 13.05% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 16.04% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 20.25% | -2.43% |
Dividends
XUSF.TO vs. HFG.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than HFG.TO's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 3.05% | 3.86% | 10.09% | 4.16% | 1.85% |
XUSF.TO iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.75% | 0.81% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUSF.TO and HFG.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for XUSF.TO and HFG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer