PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSC.TO achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.


XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDIV.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
3.65%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.94%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
12.69%11.40%11.76%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
19.17%24.92%9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.48

The correlation between XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSC.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.03

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

16.64

-12.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

56.55

-43.13

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

4.94

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.81

+0.46

Drawdowns

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-41.30%

+22.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-2.33%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-4.25%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.69%

+1.38%

Volatility

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) is 2.61%, while iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that XUSC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.81%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

6.36%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

7.85%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

10.53%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.01%

-0.29%

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSC.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUSC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.28%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.84%0.94%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

XUSC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUSC.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSC.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer