PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSC.TO achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than VGG.TO's 8.57% return.


XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGG.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
6.00%
YTD
8.57%
6M
6.30%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
12.69%11.40%11.76%
VGG.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF
8.57%8.61%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSC.TO and VGG.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.84

The correlation between XUSC.TO and VGG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VGG.TO
VGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSC.TOVGG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.94

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

10.93

+2.48

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSC.TO and VGG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSC.TOVGG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.03

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.98

+0.29

Drawdowns

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum VGG.TO drawdown of -24.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSC.TO and VGG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSC.TOVGG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-24.58%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-7.07%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-2.93%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.89%

+0.18%

Volatility

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSC.TOVGG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.59%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

7.86%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

10.23%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

12.63%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.97%

+0.75%

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSC.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VGG.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUSC.TO vs. VGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VGG.TO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGG.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF
1.02%1.16%1.23%1.37%1.35%1.21%1.25%1.24%1.50%1.46%1.63%1.70%
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.84%0.94%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSC.TO and VGG.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUSC.TO is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUSC.TO is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.

XUSC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGG.TO is Dividend. XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUSC.TO and 0.30% for VGG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSC.TO and VGG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer