PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XUS.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUS.TO returned 15.98%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for XIC.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUS.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XIC.TO.

Performance

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUS.TO achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than XIC.TO's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XUS.TO has outperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 15.98%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.

XUS.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
7.22%
YTD
12.21%
6M
10.39%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
15.98%

XIC.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.59%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.90%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUS.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF		12.21%12.19%35.16%23.31%-12.59%27.20%15.56%24.57%3.31%13.56%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		10.75%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%23.42%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XUS.TO and XIC.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.56

The correlation between XUS.TO and XIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUS.TO
XIC.TO

Technology

36.2%
6.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
34.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
0.1%

Industrials

8.1%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.9%

Energy

3.5%
18.1%

Utilities

2.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
17.2%

Technology

XUS.TO
36.2%
XIC.TO
6.7%

Financial Services

XUS.TO
11.9%
XIC.TO
34.0%

Communication Services

XUS.TO
10.9%
XIC.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUS.TO
10.1%
XIC.TO
3.7%

Healthcare

XUS.TO
8.4%
XIC.TO
0.1%

Industrials

XUS.TO
8.1%
XIC.TO
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

XUS.TO
4.9%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Energy

XUS.TO
3.5%
XIC.TO
18.1%

Utilities

XUS.TO
2.3%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

XUS.TO
1.9%
XIC.TO
1.5%

Basic Materials

XUS.TO
1.8%
XIC.TO
17.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with XUS.TO:
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TOXUS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXUS.TO vs. XUU.TOXUS.TO vs. ZSP.TOXUS.TO vs. VOOXUS.TO vs. XEF.TOXUS.TO vs. HXS.TO
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUS.TO
XUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUS.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.55
2.76

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.47
3.57

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.76

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

17.44

-4.50

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUS.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.76

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.84

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.54

+0.54

Drawdowns

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-48.21%

+20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-9.29%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-12.27%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

-16.24%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.23%

-37.21%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-1.05%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-7.04%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.00%

+0.27%

Volatility

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) is 3.19%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that XUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.48%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

10.33%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

12.67%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

13.13%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

14.96%

+1.52%

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUS.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XIC.TO's 2.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.02%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%
XUS.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF		1.12%1.26%1.03%1.22%1.38%0.99%1.35%2.02%1.77%1.48%1.66%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUS.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XUS.TO.

XUS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XIC.TO is Canada Equities. XUS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUS.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUS.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer