PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUIN.L is traded in USD, while XDNS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDNS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUIN.L achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than XDNS.L's 15.20% return.


XUIN.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.54%
YTD
13.59%
6M
14.31%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*

XDNS.L

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.37%
YTD
15.20%
6M
15.44%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
13.59%18.19%17.12%20.93%-6.85%20.93%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
15.20%25.00%8.60%17.21%-17.32%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XUIN.L and XDNS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.44

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUIN.L
XDNS.L

Industrials

93.6%
25.8%

Technology

5.9%
19.8%

Utilities

5.1%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
11.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
18.5%

Basic Materials

0.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

7.0%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Industrials

XUIN.L
93.6%
XDNS.L
25.8%

Technology

XUIN.L
5.9%
XDNS.L
19.8%

Utilities

XUIN.L
5.1%
XDNS.L
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XUIN.L
0.3%
XDNS.L
11.3%

Financial Services

XUIN.L
0.2%
XDNS.L
18.5%

Basic Materials

XUIN.L
0.2%
XDNS.L
3.2%

Communication Services

XUIN.L

-

XDNS.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

XUIN.L

-

XDNS.L
2.6%

Energy

XUIN.L

-

XDNS.L

-

Healthcare

XUIN.L

-

XDNS.L
7.0%

Real Estate

XUIN.L

-

XDNS.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUIN.L
XUIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XDNS.L
XDNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUIN.LXDNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.01

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

9.26

-0.63

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUIN.L and XDNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUIN.LXDNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.82

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.53

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.47

+0.41

Drawdowns

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUIN.L drawdown since its inception was -21.71%, smaller than the maximum XDNS.L drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUIN.L and XDNS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUIN.LXDNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

-33.26%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-12.98%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.82%

-14.96%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.71%

-33.26%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.52%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-8.69%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

4.34%

-1.64%

Volatility

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that XUIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUIN.LXDNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

4.41%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

15.97%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

21.50%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

20.08%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

18.43%

-1.02%

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUIN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUIN.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison

XUIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than XDNS.L's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.43%1.63%1.65%1.81%2.83%1.46%1.79%1.77%1.20%1.97%0.64%
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
0.91%1.01%1.12%1.17%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUIN.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUIN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUIN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XDNS.L.

XUIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDNS.L is Japan Equities. XUIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDNS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUIN.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUIN.L and XDNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer