XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L
XUIN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D) and XBCU.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) are both exchange-traded funds - XUIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XBCU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUIN.L returned 12.44%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for XBCU.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUIN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XBCU.L.
Performance
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUIN.L achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than XBCU.L's 23.15% return.
XUIN.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 13.59%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
XBCU.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 26.23%
- 1Y
- 45.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUIN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D | 13.59% | 18.19% | 17.12% | 20.93% | -6.85% | 20.93% |
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 23.15% | 26.09% | 8.64% | -9.97% | 20.96% | 35.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUIN.L and XBCU.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between XUIN.L and XBCU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Technology
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Utilities
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Consumer Cyclical
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Financial Services
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Basic Materials
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
Communication Services
XUIN.L
-
XBCU.L
Consumer Defensive
XUIN.L
-
XBCU.L
Energy
XUIN.L
-
XBCU.L
Healthcare
XUIN.L
-
XBCU.L
Real Estate
XUIN.L
-
XBCU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUIN.L
XBCU.L
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUIN.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 4.85 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 13.65 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUIN.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.54 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.83 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.27 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUIN.L drawdown since its inception was -21.71%, smaller than the maximum XBCU.L drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUIN.L and XBCU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUIN.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.71% | -62.92% | +41.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -9.34% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.82% | -12.95% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -27.83% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -2.70% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -29.73% | +25.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.33% | -0.63% |
Volatility
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that XUIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBCU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUIN.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 4.24% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 15.16% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 17.83% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 18.65% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 16.52% | +0.89% |
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUIN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCU.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUIN.L vs. XBCU.L - Dividend Comparison
XUIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while XBCU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUIN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUIN.L and XBCU.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUIN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUIN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XBCU.L.
XUIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XBCU.L is Commodities. XUIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUIN.L and 0.29% for XBCU.L.
Find the right allocation for XUIN.L and XBCU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer