PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUIN.DE achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7C.DE's 13.30% return.


XUIN.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.53%
YTD
14.33%
6M
14.79%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*

2B7C.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.11%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUIN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
14.33%6.01%23.58%16.69%-1.88%32.02%
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
13.30%6.91%23.72%13.89%-0.20%33.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.99

The correlation between XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUIN.DE
XUIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XUIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XUIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUIN.DE2B7C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.34

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

7.59

+0.10

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUIN.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.60

+0.37

Drawdowns

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.79%, smaller than the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUIN.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.79%

-41.33%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-8.89%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-22.66%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

-22.66%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.47%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-5.04%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.75%

-0.01%

Volatility

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUIN.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.74%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

10.98%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

14.45%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.73%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

19.35%

-2.64%

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUIN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUIN.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUIN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while 2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUIN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
0.90%1.07%1.07%1.20%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUIN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.

XUIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUIN.DE and 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUIN.DE and 2B7C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer