PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUHY.L achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.10% return.


XUHY.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.42%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
11.43%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.33%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUHY.L
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
1.63%9.20%7.08%13.52%-11.96%3.50%5.99%15.61%-0.01%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%-31.38%29.86%44.46%46.27%-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XUHY.L and XDWT.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.55

The correlation between XUHY.L and XDWT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUHY.L
XUHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUHY.LXDWT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.03

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

9.02

+3.53

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUHY.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUHY.LXDWT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.51

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.90

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.11

-0.53

Drawdowns

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUHY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUHY.L and XDWT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUHY.LXDWT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.78%

-35.99%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-16.86%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.78%

-26.10%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-35.99%

+19.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.66%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-6.41%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

5.68%

-5.10%

Volatility

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L) is 1.45%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that XUHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUHY.LXDWT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

7.39%

-5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

15.71%

-12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

20.39%

-16.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

23.62%

-16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

22.09%

-13.47%

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUHY.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUHY.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

XUHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, while XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUHY.L
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
6.64%6.29%7.64%5.89%6.12%9.57%5.49%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUHY.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHY.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHY.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.

XUHY.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XUHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XUHY.L and 0.25% for XDWT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUHY.L and XDWT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer