PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUHY.DE is traded in EUR, while ZFH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZFH.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUHY.DE achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than ZFH.TO's 1.98% return.


XUHY.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.54%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

ZFH.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
1.98%
6M
0.86%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
2.88%-2.73%12.71%9.45%-6.31%12.25%-3.27%18.69%6.72%
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
1.98%-2.53%9.52%12.65%-1.84%13.40%-10.08%19.31%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XUHY.DE and ZFH.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUHY.DE
XUHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ZFH.TO
ZFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ZFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUHY.DEZFH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

0.72

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

1.78

+3.62

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the ZFH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUHY.DE and ZFH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUHY.DEZFH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.38

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.49

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.39

+0.16

Drawdowns

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum ZFH.TO drawdown of -27.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUHY.DE and ZFH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUHY.DEZFH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-27.51%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-3.18%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-11.61%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-11.61%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-2.86%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-4.83%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.29%

-0.18%

Volatility

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) have volatilities of 1.13% and 1.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUHY.DEZFH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.09%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

4.07%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

5.97%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

9.63%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

11.59%

-0.20%

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUHY.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than ZFH.TO's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
6.62%6.60%7.39%6.02%6.14%9.11%5.94%4.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF
5.21%5.52%7.72%6.98%4.75%4.48%4.51%4.27%4.45%4.58%4.64%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUHY.DE and ZFH.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHY.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHY.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZFH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XUHY.DE and 0.40% for ZFH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUHY.DE and ZFH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer