PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUHY.DE achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV.AS's 9.89% return.


XUHY.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.54%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

TDIV.AS

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
9.89%
6M
12.76%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
2.88%-2.73%12.71%9.45%-6.31%12.25%-3.27%18.69%6.72%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.89%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUHY.DE
XUHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUHY.DETDIV.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

7.19

-5.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

19.93

-14.53

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUHY.DETDIV.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.79

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.43

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.84

-0.29

Drawdowns

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum TDIV.AS drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUHY.DETDIV.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-36.06%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-3.51%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-15.26%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-15.26%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-1.99%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-3.93%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.26%

-0.15%

Volatility

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) is 1.13%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that XUHY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUHY.DETDIV.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

2.38%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

6.65%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

9.06%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

12.07%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

14.31%

-2.92%

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUHY.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUHY.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison

XUHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than TDIV.AS's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.19%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
6.62%6.60%7.39%6.02%6.14%9.11%5.94%4.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHY.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHY.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

XUHY.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. XUHY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XUHY.DE and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUHY.DE and TDIV.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer