PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XUH.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUH.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUH.TO returned 13.19%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for XIC.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUH.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XIC.TO.

Performance

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUH.TO achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than XIC.TO's 12.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XUH.TO having a 13.19% annualized return and XIC.TO not far behind at 12.57%.

XUH.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.13%
YTD
9.59%
6M
9.67%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
13.19%

XIC.TO

1D
1.22%
1M
5.07%
YTD
12.10%
6M
13.12%
1Y
36.92%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		9.59%15.11%22.45%24.06%-20.19%26.19%15.53%28.46%-7.51%20.10%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		12.10%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%23.42%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XUH.TO and XIC.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.64

The correlation between XUH.TO and XIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUH.TO
XIC.TO

Technology

38.5%
6.7%

Financial Services

11.0%
34.0%

Communication Services

10.2%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
3.7%

Industrials

8.3%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
2.9%

Energy

3.3%
18.1%

Utilities

2.5%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
17.2%

Technology

XUH.TO
38.5%
XIC.TO
6.7%

Financial Services

XUH.TO
11.0%
XIC.TO
34.0%

Communication Services

XUH.TO
10.2%
XIC.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUH.TO
9.6%
XIC.TO
3.7%

Industrials

XUH.TO
8.3%
XIC.TO
10.0%

Healthcare

XUH.TO
8.2%
XIC.TO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XUH.TO
4.4%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Energy

XUH.TO
3.3%
XIC.TO
18.1%

Utilities

XUH.TO
2.5%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

XUH.TO
2.0%
XIC.TO
1.5%

Basic Materials

XUH.TO
1.8%
XIC.TO
17.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with XUH.TO:
XUH.TO vs. XUU.TOXUH.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUH.TO vs. VFV.TOXUH.TO vs. XSU.TOXUH.TO vs. VSP.TOXUH.TO vs. IUSGXUH.TO vs. VYM
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUH.TO
XUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUH.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.02
2.92

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.82
3.75

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.53

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.99

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

18.51

-6.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUH.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUH.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.92

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.14

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.84

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.54

+0.09

Drawdowns

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUH.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUH.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.37%

-48.21%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-9.29%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-12.27%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-16.24%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.37%

-37.21%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-7.04%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.00%

+0.07%

Volatility

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) is 3.21%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that XUH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUH.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.61%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

10.39%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

12.71%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

13.14%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

14.96%

+3.74%

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUH.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUH.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than XIC.TO's 2.00% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.00%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.82%0.91%1.10%1.15%1.40%0.98%1.25%1.67%1.81%1.25%1.63%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUH.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XUH.TO.

XUH.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XIC.TO is Canada Equities. XUH.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XUH.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUH.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer