XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO).
XUH.TO and VSP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Feb 17, 2015. VSP.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012. Both XUH.TO and VSP.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XUH.TO or VSP.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XUH.TO and VSP.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XUH.TO:
1.79
VSP.TO:
1.83
XUH.TO:
2.50
VSP.TO:
2.51
XUH.TO:
1.33
VSP.TO:
1.34
XUH.TO:
2.71
VSP.TO:
2.75
XUH.TO:
10.40
VSP.TO:
11.29
XUH.TO:
2.13%
VSP.TO:
2.02%
XUH.TO:
12.39%
VSP.TO:
12.42%
XUH.TO:
-38.37%
VSP.TO:
-35.55%
XUH.TO:
0.00%
VSP.TO:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XUH.TO having a 4.47% return and VSP.TO slightly lower at 4.27%. Over the past 10 years, XUH.TO has underperformed VSP.TO with an annualized return of 11.30%, while VSP.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.
XUH.TO
4.47%
1.31%
9.51%
23.08%
12.33%
11.30%
VSP.TO
4.27%
1.72%
9.18%
23.50%
13.07%
11.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUH.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XUH.TO
VSP.TO
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than VSP.TO's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUH.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.05% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 1.25% | 1.67% | 1.81% | 1.25% | 1.63% | 1.62% | 0.00% |
VSP.TO Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.07% | 1.27% | 1.52% | 1.76% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.75% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, which is greater than VSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUH.TO and VSP.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XUH.TO vs. VSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.