PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUH.TO vs. COW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XUH.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and COW.TO (iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - XUH.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while COW.TO tracks the Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUH.TO returned 13.19%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for COW.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUH.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for COW.TO.

Performance

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUH.TO achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than COW.TO's 15.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XUH.TO has outperformed COW.TO with an annualized return of 13.19%, while COW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.

XUH.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.17%
YTD
9.59%
6M
9.81%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
13.19%

COW.TO

1D
0.40%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
15.84%
6M
13.53%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		9.59%15.11%22.45%24.06%-20.19%26.19%15.53%28.46%-7.51%20.10%
COW.TO
iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF		15.84%-0.67%5.62%-8.61%12.64%19.02%11.66%25.91%-14.26%14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XUH.TO and COW.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between XUH.TO and COW.TO has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUH.TO
COW.TO

Technology

38.5%

-

Financial Services

11.0%
0.5%

Communication Services

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
1.7%

Industrials

8.3%
28.0%

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
42.3%

Energy

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
27.4%

Technology

XUH.TO
38.5%
COW.TO

-

Financial Services

XUH.TO
11.0%
COW.TO
0.5%

Communication Services

XUH.TO
10.2%
COW.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XUH.TO
9.6%
COW.TO
1.7%

Industrials

XUH.TO
8.3%
COW.TO
28.0%

Healthcare

XUH.TO
8.2%
COW.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XUH.TO
4.4%
COW.TO
42.3%

Energy

XUH.TO
3.3%
COW.TO

-

Utilities

XUH.TO
2.5%
COW.TO

-

Real Estate

XUH.TO
2.0%
COW.TO

-

Basic Materials

XUH.TO
1.8%
COW.TO
27.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF

Often compared with XUH.TO:
XUH.TO vs. XUU.TOXUH.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUH.TO vs. VFV.TOXUH.TO vs. XSU.TOXUH.TO vs. VSP.TOXUH.TO vs. IUSGXUH.TO vs. VYM
Often compared with COW.TO:
COW.TO vs. NTR.TOCOW.TO vs. CWW.TOCOW.TO vs. COWGCOW.TO vs. XHC.TOCOW.TO vs. VOOCOW.TO vs. DBACOW.TO vs. ZWC.TO

Return for Risk

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUH.TO
XUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
COW.TO
COW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
COW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) and iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUH.TOCOW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.02
0.63

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.82
1.03

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.12

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.94

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

1.94

+10.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the COW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUH.TO and COW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUH.TOCOW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.63

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.23

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.45

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.36

+0.28

Drawdowns

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, smaller than the maximum COW.TO drawdown of -55.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUH.TO and COW.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUH.TOCOW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.37%

-55.00%

+16.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-10.51%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-14.51%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-29.82%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.37%

-36.62%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-7.17%

+6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-13.94%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

5.06%

-2.99%

Volatility

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) is 3.21%, while iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that XUH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUH.TOCOW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.85%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

12.44%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

15.68%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.87%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

19.30%

-0.60%

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUH.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than COW.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

XUH.TO vs. COW.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than COW.TO's 2.07% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COW.TO
iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF		2.07%2.40%1.43%1.62%2.03%0.69%1.02%1.02%1.07%0.58%1.10%1.78%
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.82%0.91%1.10%1.15%1.40%0.98%1.25%1.67%1.81%1.25%1.63%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUH.TO and COW.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUH.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for COW.TO.

XUH.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while COW.TO tracks Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XUH.TO and 0.72% for COW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUH.TO and COW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer